Sunday, February 06, 2005

Andrew Sullivan is the GhEy

A big time blog celebrity is teh GhEy. I am redefining GhEy to take the old
negative connotation of "Gay" as used in south park can be applied to
Andrew. Lets forget Andrew using his fundraising drives to help fund his jet
setting to Europe and elsewhere (or prostitutes or whatever) that has under
the old negative connotation of "Gay" is already transcendental in its
nature. But I am going to take a larger stroke of the "queer" behavior in
how Andrew has conducted himself as a new media personality.

It is not just his whorishness about his fundraising that makes him exceed the old negative nomenclature of gay he has become almost motorcycles.. A strange alien and meaningless word.

What makes Andrew so sad now is his Happy Wand.

Note the following will probably offend gay people, religious conservatives, and god knows who else.

Ok here is the deal, Andrew is all happy and having his own sexuality and social mores but if we look at his blogging and his issue advocacy its the same way. He, like the canidate he supported, voted for the war before he voted against it.

Andrew was harsh on the president's spending but big deal... even rush ( a man who is probably the biggest GWB shill on the planet)

and Andrew seemed to flip when The President went more into the religious conservative camp ( to see to it those folks all showed up to vote for him.)

and then all of a sudden Andrew flip-flopped

thus it comes down to Little Andrew, not about some great moral viewpoint. Andrew Sullivan a man who is ultimately brilliant has had his politics be defined by his penis


nothing could be more clear then this little gem from Andrew's page

WHY NOT AN ANTI-ABORTION AMENDMENT? Here's an interesting question, posed by my friend Jon Rauch. The Senate Republicans have vowed to push their anti-gay marriage amendment, even though it won't stand a chance of getting the necessary 67 votes. The point is political and rhetorical. They are trying to build momentum, raise money, and keep the cause of banning same-sex unions alive. So why not push an anti-abortion amendment instead? They have one such amendment on hand. Both proposed amendments are allegedly against judicial meddling. Both will fail. But one deals with a much graver issue, by the religious right's reckoning - an immense loss of human life, rather than the grave evil of two human beings committing to one another for life. So why this priority? Surely, abortion is a more important matter than same-sex marriage - even for the religious right. Or is it?


The reason is money, but you knew that Andrew. The last time Anti-Abortion Amendment calls made the political machine that supports the GOP any money was when everyone got offended by the Partial Birth Abortion procedure, and President Clinton didn't let the republicans ban it.

Gay marriage is now a hot topic, its a way for the political parties ( left and right) to sheer people like Andrew Sullivan to put out their hard earned money into supporting them.

to quote Chris Rock "The Money is in the medicine."

and lets not get into a natural rights argument about gay marriage as the concept of homosexuality is.... Drum roll please..... A Modern concept

sorry to burst your bubble Andrew but there haven't always been gay people. When Marriage +Sex+ love= family in the modern world's lexicon then and only then did homosexuality come into being.

Now we've had men having sex with women for ages, but those men understood that sexual pleasure was one thing, social compacts ( such as marriage) were another.

just as your shilling for a book written by an author who committed an abortion on the ethical standards of history, so he could some how make himself feel better about being gay "If Abraham Lincoln is gay they have to accept me."

putting your sexuality as the defining concept of your life is a weak and mentally flacid position. You like to have sex with men, other then you who really gives a rats ass?

other then men you will want to ( or who will want to have sex with you) who cares?

you turned on your political beliefs based on your happy little friend Andrew, you retire as a lure to get people to fund your little spats of blogging

go sell out Andrew, become a pundit on MSNBC ( they need the help) and become one of them, because you a long time ago stopped being one of us.

No comments: