Friday, June 10, 2005

those inclusive democrats

in polipundit land some fun things have been exposed about another big effort of Howard the Dean to diversify the party

“People are very upset that the Democratic Party is doing this, is abandoning women,” said Kim Gandy, president of the National Organization of Women. “We don’t understand why they don’t learn. How many elections do you have to lose?” (He...hehe... )

“Emily’s List, which supports only female candidates, has no plans to get involved. NARAL Pro-Choice America also likely won’t be involved because Casey and Santorum support abortion restrictions. Martha Burk, chairwoman of the National Council of Women’s Organizations, said the women’s groups plan to meet with (Demcratic candidate) Chuck Pennacchio and could support him to send party leaders a message. She and other women’s leaders said Democrats might be better off losing the race than electing Casey.”

“In terms of women’s lives, what difference does it make whether we have a pro-life Democrat and a pro-life Republican?” Burk asked.


yes folks.... apperently ideological diversity means democrats lose and ideological lock step means they win

as we saw in the 2004 election

way to win their guys

No comments: